Litera does not print a Kira price, and the estimates you will find online disagree by a factor of ten. This page lays out every reported figure with its source and date, shows where the cheap numbers come from, and tells you which pricing structure a small firm should actually ask for.
Every Kira figure below is labeled as published by Litera or reported by a named third party with a date. Nothing here is a quote you can hold anyone to.
Start a review
Drop a document below. The first review runs without an account.
Contracts, briefs, leases and exhibits
One document per review, PDF, Word, images
First review runs without an account. Encrypted in transit, kept private to your account.
Kira, now sold by Litera, has no published price. Reported estimates start near $5,000 a year for a team of up to ten users, run $20,000 to $50,000 for mid-size teams, and reach $50,000 to $150,000 or more for enterprise deployments, with implementation of roughly $2,000 to $20,000 on top. Firm-wide Litera platform deals at Am Law and Magic Circle firms are reported in the high six to low seven figures. The low end is the least reliable part of that range, and a small firm with one diligence project should ask Litera for per-matter pricing rather than a subscription.
Start with what the vendor puts in writing, because nobody can misreport it. We checked the Kira page on litera.com and the Litera trust center on September 21, 2026. There is no price and no signup path. These are the commercial facts Litera does disclose.
| What a buyer wants to know | What Litera publishes |
|---|---|
| Price per user or per month | Nothing. No figure appears on the Kira product page. |
| Plan or tier names | None. Kira is sold as a product within the Litera platform. |
| Self-serve signup or trial | None. The path is a demo request. |
| What it does | Extracts provisions from contracts into review grids, with more than 1,400 pre-built smart fields plus fields you train yourself. Grids are built for M&A, real estate, banking and finance. |
| Accuracy claim | 95 percent or better precision on target provisions, per Litera. A vendor claim, not an independent test. |
| Generative AI | January 2026 release added a hybrid of generative AI and proprietary models trained on more than one million contracts, Grid Chat for plain-language questions across a review, and generative smart fields created from a prompt. |
| Integrations | Microsoft 365, Litera Transact, HighQ and Intralinks. |
| Security paperwork | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3, listed on the Litera trust center. |
| Ownership | Litera agreed to acquire Kira Systems in August 2021, amount undisclosed. Kira spun off Zuva for the corporate market as part of the deal. |
Sources: litera.com Kira product page and trust.litera.com, checked September 21, 2026; Litera press release on Kira capabilities, January 27, 2026; Litera acquisition announcement, August 10, 2021.
Kira has been on the market since before the generative AI wave, so there are more estimates in circulation than for newer vendors. That does not make them better. Read the confidence column before you carry any of these into a budget meeting.
| Reported figure | What it covers | Source and date | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| From about $100 per user per month | Starting price, with a warning that implementation, add-ons and annual increases often make the real cost about three times higher | ITQlick, February 2026 | Low. A starting figure with no stated basis. |
| About $500 a month, or $5,000 a year | Small businesses with up to 10 users | ToolsForHumans, reviewed March 24, 2026 | Low. Contradicts the per-user figure above. |
| $2,000 to $5,000 a month | Around 100 users, which the same source converts to $20,000 to $50,000 a year | ToolsForHumans, reviewed March 24, 2026 | Low. The monthly and yearly figures do not multiply out. |
| About $5,000, $20,000 to $50,000, and $50,000 to $150,000+ a year | Small, mid-range and enterprise tiers, labeled as estimates from public sources | ClearTerms comparison page, February 2026 (a competing vendor) | Low. Repeats the same low-end number and discloses that it is estimated. |
| $50,000 to $100,000 a year | Enterprise-only deployment | AI Vortex, April 17, 2026 | Low to medium. Consistent with enterprise sales motion. |
| High six to low seven figures a year | Firm-wide Litera platform commitments at Am Law and Magic Circle firms. Standalone Kira for smaller firms or single diligence engagements runs materially lower | agenticcontractreview.com, verified June 2026 | Medium for the shape, low for any number. |
| $2,010 and $58,847 a year | Average annual spend on ALL Litera products, not Kira alone, for SMB and enterprise customers respectively, from 160 customers | SpendHound, updated July 14, 2026 | Medium for Litera overall. Not a Kira price. |
| $2,000 to $20,000+ once | Implementation, from small business to large enterprise, with training, customization and data migration listed as further costs | ToolsForHumans, March 2026 | Low to medium. Normal for enterprise software. |
None of these figures comes from Litera. Nothing here is an offer, and your quote will differ by user count, document volume, bundle and how hard you negotiate.
The figure most small firms latch onto is "about $5,000 a year for up to ten users". Check it against the other number in circulation and it falls apart. At the reported starting price of $100 per user per month, ten users cost $12,000 a year before implementation. Apply the same source's warning that the real cost tends to be three times the starting price and you are at $36,000. The $5,000 figure is less than half of the cheapest reading of the per-user price, and the vendor comparison page that repeats it says in its own footnote that it is estimated.
Here is the arithmetic on the two per-user inputs, set against the enterprise range and a published price. None of the Kira rows is a quote. They show the order of magnitude you should expect before the first call.
| Scenario | Per year | Per month | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 users at the reported starting price | $6,000 | $500 | $100 per user per month, before implementation |
| 5 users at three times the starting price | $18,000 | $1,500 | The same source's own warning about real cost |
| 10 users at the reported starting price | $12,000 | $1,000 | Already more than double the $5,000 small-team estimate |
| 10 users at three times the starting price | $36,000 | $3,000 | Close to the bottom of the reported enterprise range |
| Reported enterprise deployment | $50,000 to $100,000 | About $4,170 to $8,330 | AI Vortex, April 2026, plus implementation |
| LegalSoul Professional, published | $3,588, or $1,788 paid yearly | $299, 500 document reviews | Listed price, no implementation fee, cancellable monthly |
The gap is not an argument that Kira is overpriced. It is an argument about fit. Kira pulls the same provisions out of hundreds of agreements into a grid so a deal team can see every change of control and assignment clause in a data room at once. If what you need is one contract, lease or brief read carefully for risk, you are looking at a different category of product. Our AI contract review software page shows exactly what comes back from a single document.
Since the Litera acquisition, Kira is sold two ways that matter to a smaller buyer: as a module in a broader Litera platform commitment, and on per-firm or per-matter terms. Most of the pages that rank for Kira pricing talk only about users, which is the wrong frame for a firm whose need is a single acquisition, a lease portfolio review or a one-off audit of a client's vendor contracts.
If that is your situation, ask Litera to price the matter, not the seat. Scope it by document count and duration, ask whether the fields you need are among the pre-built ones, and ask what happens to the documents and the grid once the engagement closes. A per-matter quote can often be passed through to the client as a disbursement, which a subscription cannot.
If your need is ongoing but modest, a few dozen contracts a month read one at a time for issues, neither Kira structure is designed for you, and the honest answer is a review tool with a listed monthly price.
The Kira, Luminance and Spellbook rows are reported by third parties, not published by the vendor. The goHeather and LegalSoul rows are prices you can read off the vendor's own pricing page today.
| Tool | Publishes a price | Cost | Built for | How you buy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kira (Litera) | No | Reported about $5,000 to $150,000+ a year | Extracting provisions across many agreements for diligence | Demo, pilot, per user, per firm or per matter |
| Luminance | No | About $43,000 to $60,000 a year implied average | Repository-scale review, obligations and autonomous NDA negotiation | Demo, pilot, contracts typically 36 months |
| Spellbook | No | Reported $89 to $199 a user per month on annual terms | Drafting and redlining inside Microsoft Word | Trial for firms, license per team member |
| goHeather | Yes | Starter $400 a month or $2,400 a year, one seat; Team quoted | SMBs, fractional GCs and small teams reviewing contracts monthly | Trial with a card on file |
| LegalSoul | Yes | $99, $299 or $1,749 a month, listed | Reading one contract, lease, brief or exhibit for issues and risky clauses | Sign up and run one now |
The sources behind the rival figures are broken down on our Luminance legal AI pricing page and Spellbook pricing page. goHeather pricing is from goheather.io/pricing, checked September 21, 2026.
To be straight about our own limits: LegalSoul reviews one document at a time. It does not build a diligence grid across a data room, it has no trainable extraction fields, and it has no SOC 2 report and no SAML single sign-on, which will matter if your client security questionnaires ask for them. What it does is read a contract, lease, brief or exhibit and hand back the issues, risky clauses, missing terms and page cites in under a minute, at a price printed on the AI legal software pricing page.
Because Kira can be priced three different ways, the quality of your quote depends on scoping the call precisely. Ask these in this order.
Most firms that search for Kira pricing are trying to fix one of two problems: too many agreements to get through in a deal, or too little time to read each incoming contract properly. Only the first is a Kira problem. Take the five contracts or leases that cost you the most time last month and run them through a review tool that charges a listed monthly price.
If most of the pain disappears, you have saved yourself a procurement cycle. If it does not, because the bottleneck really is pulling the same clause out of four hundred documents, you now know that before the demo and can scope a per-matter quote far more precisely.
The upload box at the top of this page runs on the real product. One document, no sales call, and the plans are listed from $99 a month.
Litera publishes no Kira price. Third-party estimates run from about $5,000 a year for a team of up to ten users to $50,000 to $150,000 or more for enterprise deployments, with implementation of $2,000 to $20,000 on top. Firm-wide platform deals at the largest law firms are reported in the high six to low seven figures a year.
No. The Kira product page on litera.com lists capabilities, integrations and customer claims but no price, no plan names and no self-serve signup. Every Kira dollar figure you will find online is an estimate from a directory, a buying guide or a competing vendor, and the estimates disagree with each other by a factor of ten or more.
Kira is quoted, not listed. Buying guides describe custom pricing driven by the size of the implementation, the volume of documents reviewed and how many contracts must stay searchable. Since Litera bought Kira in 2021 it is also sold as a module in the Litera platform, and per-firm and per-matter structures are both reported.
Partly. One buying guide reports Kira starting at about $100 per user per month, and warns that implementation, add-ons and annual increases often take the real cost to about three times that. Other sources describe per-firm and per-matter pricing instead, so ask which metric your quote uses before you compare it with anything.
It can if it has a real diligence project, and it should ask for per-matter pricing rather than a subscription. A firm of two to ten lawyers that needs individual contracts and leases read for risk every week is buying an extraction platform built for M&A data rooms. Our Kira alternative guide for small law firms compares the tools that fit that job.
There is no self-serve trial or signup on litera.com. Directories list a pilot, described by AI Suggests as a 30-day proof of concept for enterprise teams, which is scoped with Litera sales. Expect a demo first and a pilot on your own documents second.
Litera. Litera agreed to acquire Kira Systems in August 2021 for an undisclosed amount. As part of the deal Kira spun off a separate company, Zuva, to serve the corporate market, and Insight Partners, which had invested $50 million in Kira in 2018, became a minority investor in Litera.
For repository-scale diligence the usual comparison is Luminance. For drafting and redlining inside Microsoft Word it is Spellbook. For a small firm that simply needs one contract, lease or brief read for issues and risky clauses, a document review tool with a published monthly price, such as LegalSoul from $99 a month, is the closer fit.
Upload one contract, lease or brief and read the issues, risky clauses and page cites in under a minute. Plans are published from $99 a month, with no seat minimum and no sales call.
Sign up