Plaintiff AI pricing, sourced
Supio names two plans and prints no number. It does tell you how it bills: by the case, with unlimited users and no lock-in. Here is what that means for a firm your size, and which of the figures floating around actually apply.
Each figure below is marked as stated by Supio, reported by a named third party, or our own arithmetic. None of it is a quote.
Start a review
Drop a document below. The first review runs without an account.
Contracts, briefs, leases and exhibits
One document per review, PDF, Word, images
First review runs without an account. Encrypted in transit, kept private to your account.
The short version for a managing partner.
Supio does not publish a price. It sells two plans, Case Subscription and Unlimited Firm Access, both priced by the case and quoted after a demo. Every agreement includes unlimited users and unlimited pages, and Supio says there are no lock-in contracts or platform fees. The one per-case estimate in circulation, $50 to $150 a case, comes from a competitor.
So the number to bring to the call is your own ceiling: cases you open in a year, times what a case is worth saving. Supio claims $500 to $1,000 saved per case. Even at a tenth of that, a per-case fee in the estimated range pays for itself on time alone, which is why the contract terms matter more than the sticker.
The pricing page is short, and every button on it leads to a demo request. What it does commit to in writing is more useful than most vendors' pages: the unit you pay for, what is never metered, and the absence of a contract lock. The difference between the two plans is how much you commit to and how low the per-case price goes.
The FAQ also mentions buying a "10-pack" through sales, which reads like a block of ten cases. It is not defined anywhere else on the page, so ask what it costs and whether unused cases carry over.
"Ideal for larger firms wanting predictable cost at a better value."
Fits a firm that can forecast its intake for the year.
"Ideal for firms wanting to transform how they service clients."
Fits a firm that wants every case and every role on the platform.
Search results for Supio's price are thin. These are all the dollar figures we could find tied to Supio, and who published each one. Three of the four sources sell a competing product.
| Figure | What it measures | Source and date | How much to trust it |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dollar figure | Both plans, "Get Pricing" and "Go Unlimited" buttons | supio.com/pricing, checked Oct 20, 2026 | Primary source. The structure is fact, the price is a quote |
| "Contact" on both plans | Tracked since April 29, 2026, no price changes recorded | PricingSaaS, last seen June 21, 2026 | Confirms there has been no public price this year |
| $50 to $150 per case | Estimated Supio cost per case, $100 used as the average | CaseBridge, updated Oct 2, 2026; it sells prepaid case packages | Low. A rival's comparison, no source given, and it adds a monthly base fee Supio says it does not charge |
| $150 to $400 per user a month | Tiers of $150 to $200, $200 to $300 and $300+ per user | ProPlaintiff, April 3, 2026, a competitor | Very low for Supio. Labeled an estimate for comparable tools, and Supio does not bill per seat |
| "Custom pricing" | Sales call required | Casefleet comparison page, a competitor | Accurate, adds nothing new |
| $500 to $1,000 saved per case | Value Supio claims for its customers | Supio homepage | Vendor claim, not audited. Useful as the top of your budget |
The most repeated Supio number online is $150 to $400 per user per month. It traces back to a pricing guide from ProPlaintiff, a company that sells a competing plaintiff platform, and that guide calls its tiers market estimates for comparable tools. Supio's own pricing page says the opposite of a seat model: every agreement includes unlimited firm users, with no per-seat pricing.
That matters for how you budget. Under a seat model, a five-lawyer firm with three paralegals pays for eight logins whether it opens 40 cases a year or 400. Under Supio's model, the headcount is free and the case count is what you pay for. A busy firm with a small staff pays more than the seat math suggests. A firm with a large team and a modest docket pays less.
The only estimate in the right unit is CaseBridge's $50 to $150 per case. It also comes from a rival, but at least it measures the thing Supio charges for. CaseBridge then adds a monthly base on top and lands near $1,300 a month at 10 cases. Supio's page says there is no platform fee, so if a quote includes one, ask what it is for. Set the per-case range against what a case is worth saving and the quote has a lot of room.
The nine hours are EvenUp's claim for its own product, used here as a yardstick for in-house paralegal time. A LegalSoul review reads one uploaded document; it does not build a chronology or draft a demand.
Multiply the estimated per-case range by the cases you open in a year, then set it against Supio's own savings claim. This is arithmetic on an estimate and a vendor claim. Your quote can land anywhere, but it gives you a ceiling to negotiate under.
| Cases a year | At $50 to $150 a case (estimate) | Supio's claim, $500 to $1,000 saved a case | 9 paralegal hours a case at $29.33 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 (5 a month) | $3,000 to $9,000 | $30,000 to $60,000 | about $15,800 |
| 150 (about 12 a month) | $7,500 to $22,500 | $75,000 to $150,000 | about $39,600 |
| 300 (25 a month) | $15,000 to $45,000 | $150,000 to $300,000 | about $79,200 |
Read across a row. If a quote for 150 cases comes in near $22,500, the time saved covers it with room to spare even if Supio's savings claim is twice as generous as your reality. If the quote comes in far above the paralegal column, the rest has to be earned in bigger settlements.
Supio says pricing flexes with firm size and case volume. These are the levers behind that sentence, drawn from its pricing page, its integrations and the way per-case contracts usually work.
The biggest driver. More cases buys a lower per-case price, and Unlimited Firm Access removes the count entirely.
Case Subscription fits a forecastable docket; Unlimited suits firms putting every file on the platform.
Ask how existing files are charged when you load your current inventory. It can double year one.
Unlimited includes the most support, including on-site training. Lighter onboarding should cost less.
Supio connects to Litify and Smokeball. Ask whether integration work is inside the price.
Supio added a one-click Westlaw Advantage integration in April 2026. You need your own Westlaw seat.
The three plaintiff platforms on most shortlists, plus where LegalSoul sits. Supio wins on contract terms and breadth across the case. LegalSoul is not a substitute for demand drafting; it is the cheaper answer when the job is reading the documents.
| Supio | EvenUp | Eve | LegalSoul | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Published price | No | No | No | Yes, $99, $299, $1,749 a month |
| Billing unit | Case, or unlimited cases | One cost per case since May 15, 2025 | Platform fee plus per-Matter page tiers | Monthly plan with a set number of reviews |
| Reported cost | $50 to $150 a case (rival estimate) | $500 to $2,000 a month for most PI firms (AI Vortex, Apr 2026) | Quote only | $99 for 100 reviews |
| Commitment | No lock-in, says Supio | At least one year, reported | Ask | Monthly, no annual term |
| Users | Unlimited | Not stated | Not stated | Per plan |
| Trial | Pilot on a handful of cases | Demo, 4 to 8 week evaluation reported | Demo | First review with no account |
| Security | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR | SOC 2 audited, HIPAA attested | Ask for the report | No SOC 2 report or SAML SSO today |
| What it does | Chronologies, demand letters, case ledger, litigation drafting, intake, an agent | Demand packages built on settlement data | Plaintiff case work from intake to drafting | Reads one document: issues, risky clauses, page cites |
Full breakdowns: EvenUp pricing and cost per case and Eve Legal pricing.
"No lock-in" and "unlimited" are good starting terms. These questions turn them into numbers you can put in the order form and compare against EvenUp and Eve on one sheet.
At intake, at the first upload, or when a demand goes out. A case that settles early should not cost the same as one that goes to suit.
Get the per-case price and the assumed volume as two separate numbers, so you can test the quote against your own intake.
The FAQ mentions it without a price. Ask whether unused cases roll over or expire.
A firm with 120 open files can pay for a year of volume on day one if the backlog counts as new cases.
Number of cases, length, price, and what happens to the work if you do not buy.
Ask for the notice period, any minimum case commitment and any renewal price increase in the order form.
You need the BAA before treatment records go in, and the receipt if you pass costs through under your fee agreement.
LegalSoul does not draft demand letters, build a medical chronology across a case file or run intake. If that is the job, Supio, EvenUp and Eve are the right shortlist and this page should help you price them.
Many small plaintiff firms also have a narrower problem that does not need a platform: reading the paper that decides what the client keeps. The release, the settlement agreement, the lien letters, the policy language. Upload one and LegalSoul returns the issues, risky clauses and missing terms with page cites in under a minute. Solo is $99 a month for 100 reviews, Professional $299 for 500, with no annual term and no sales call.
Supio publishes no price. Its pricing page names two plans, Case Subscription and Unlimited Firm Access, both billed by the case and quoted after a demo. The only per-case estimate in circulation, $50 to $150 a case, comes from a competitor. Plan on a quote and a pilot before you know your number.
No, according to Supio. Every agreement includes unlimited firm users and unlimited pages, with no per-seat pricing. The $150 to $400 per user a month range you may see comes from a competitor that labels it an estimate for comparable tools, so it does not describe how Supio bills.
Nobody can say from public data, because neither prints a price. Both bill by the case. Supio says it has no platform fee and no lock-in contract, while EvenUp is reported to require at least a one-year term. At equal case prices, the vendor you can leave carries less risk. Our Supio vs EvenUp pricing comparison runs the numbers at 60, 150 and 300 cases.
There is no self-serve trial. Supio offers a pilot in which a firm runs a handful of its own cases before a wider rollout. The length and price of the pilot are not published, so ask for both in writing, along with what happens to the pilot cases if you do not buy.
Supio says it does not. Its pricing page states there are no lock-in contracts or platform fees. Confirm the notice period, any minimum number of cases and any renewal price increase in the order form itself, because a plan priced on case volume can still carry a volume commitment.
Sometimes. ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 29, 2024) treats AI tools that work like general office software as overhead, while a cost incurred for one client's matter can be passed through if the fee agreement allows it. Supio issues a receipt for each case, which many firms use to recover per-case costs. Check your state rules first.
Supio states that it is HIPAA and GDPR compliant and SOC 2 Type 2 certified, encrypts data in transit and at rest, and does not use client data to train outside AI models. Ask for the SOC 2 report and a signed Business Associate Agreement before you upload treatment records.
Personal injury and mass tort firms that want one platform across the case, from intake and chronologies to demand letters and litigation drafting. Supio raised a $60 million Series B in April 2025, about $91 million in total, with Thomson Reuters Ventures among its investors. Firms that only need to read settlement documents can start smaller.
Upload a settlement agreement, release, policy or lien letter and get the issues, risky clauses and page cites in under a minute. Plans are published from $99 a month, with no seat minimum and no sales call.
Sign up