Sirion vs Icertis Pricing for Small Legal Teams
Sirion has filed a rate card with a $84,269 floor. Icertis has published nothing, and Vendr tracks two contracts. Here is what each costs and which a small legal team can defend.
Review a legal document right now
Upload a contract, brief, lease or exhibit and LegalSoul returns the issues, the risky clauses and the page cites in under a minute. Published pricing, no seat minimum, no quote process.
Short answer. Sirion has the lower published floor, and Icertis has the higher ceiling. Sirion's own UK government filing puts its smallest possible contract at about $84,269 a year and its cheapest contract intelligence tier at $112,358, both with user minimums. Icertis publishes nothing, and the only signed-contract data on Vendr is two purchases, $48,360 and $169,890 a year. Neither is built for a team under about 20 people, and both need months to implement.
The two sit on the same enterprise shortlist and get compared on features. For a legal team that has to defend a budget line, the more useful comparison is how much evidence each vendor leaves you to price it with. Sirion has filed a rate card. Icertis has not, so you are working from a short list of buyer reports and estimates.
Sirion vs Icertis pricing side by side
| Question a buyer asks | Sirion | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Is a US price published? | No. Custom quote. A per-user rate card is in Sirion's UK G-Cloud 14 pricing document | No. icertis.com/pricing returns a not-found page, calls to action are Request Demo |
| How it is priced | Per user a month, casual and primary users, with a minimum user commitment | Seats plus contract volume plus modules, quoted per buyer |
| Per-user rates | $94 to $334 a month depending on tier and user type (converted from £70 to £250) | Not published |
| Minimum | 100 users on Contract Intelligence and Contract Management, 30 on supplier management | None published |
| Smallest contract on record | About $84,269 a year (supplier management, 30 casual users) | $48,360 a year (Vendr, one of two tracked purchases) |
| Highest on record | $280,896 a year (Contract Management, 100 primary users, list) | $169,890 a year (Vendr, the other tracked purchase) |
| Year one with implementation | Implementation not priced in the filing | $100,000 to $300,000 per a rival buying guide, with 6 to 12 month rollouts |
| Free trial | None | None, demo request |
Pounds are converted at 1.3376 dollars per pound, the ECB reference rate on October 22, 2026. The Sirion filing is a UK public-sector rate card, so treat it as a benchmark for a US quote, not a US price. Icertis has only two tracked purchases on Vendr, which is too few to call a median.
What does Sirion cost?
Sirion's filing lists three tiers. Contract Intelligence runs £70 a month for a casual user and £95 for a primary user, with a 100-user minimum. Contract Management runs £120 and £175, also with 100 users. Supplier management (SRM) runs £175 and £250 with a 30-user minimum. Multiply by the minimum and by twelve and the cheapest Intelligence subscription is £84,000, or $112,358. The cheapest anything is SRM with 30 casual users at £63,000, or $84,269. Integrations such as e-signature are excluded and priced separately. The full table is on our Sirion pricing page.
What does Icertis cost?
Nobody outside Icertis can say exactly, and the figures in circulation are not equally solid. The two Vendr purchases are real signed contracts, at $48,360 and $169,890 a year. A rival vendor's buying guide puts year one at $100,000 to $300,000 once implementation and training are added. Sacra estimates revenue per customer in the $1.1 million to $1.4 million range, but that is an average across very large accounts. A widely repeated "$88,000 median" cited to Vendr does not appear on Vendr's public page, so we do not use it. Each figure and its evidence grade are on our Icertis pricing page.
Where each one wins
Sirion is the stronger fit when the risk sits after signature: supplier obligations, service levels, performance against contract. It names that focus itself, and it is the reason its supplier management tier has a lower floor than its contract management tier. Icertis is the stronger fit for a large company that wants one global contract platform tied to SAP, Salesforce or Microsoft Dynamics, with analytics and AI agents across procurement, sales and legal. It is built for that scale, and it is priced like it.
Where both lose is the small team. A 5 to 15 person legal department would pay six figures for a platform that takes a quarter or more to configure, to solve a problem that is often simply that nobody has time to read supplier paper. If you are weighing these two for a team that size, price a mid-market option beside them. The Agiloft vs Icertis pricing comparison and the Sirion vs Ironclad pricing comparison show where the cheaper enterprise options land.
What year one looks like for a small legal team
| Line | Sirion, Contract Intelligence, 100 casual users | Icertis, buyer-reported range |
|---|---|---|
| Subscription | $112,358 (£84,000) | $48,360 to $169,890 |
| Integrations | About $13,376 each, excluded from the tier | Priced inside the quote |
| Implementation | Not priced in the filing | Included in the $100,000 to $300,000 year one guide figure |
| Time to go live | Reported 3 to 6 months | Reported 6 to 12 months |
Even the lowest numbers here are many times the cost of a document review tool. Sirion's list price assumes no discount, and a US buyer at volume would negotiate one. Ask both vendors the same questions before you sign: the minimum user count in your quote, how casual and primary users are counted, which integrations are included, what implementation costs and who performs it, whether AI features are in the base price, and the renewal increase cap.
Sirion vs Icertis for small legal teams, which should you pick?
Neither, unless your contract volume is in the thousands. If you must choose, pick Sirion when obligations and supplier performance are the point, because its filing lets you check the quote. Pick Icertis only when you are buying a company-wide platform and can absorb a 6 to 12 month rollout.
If the real backlog is reading, LegalSoul does that job for $99 a month. Upload a supplier MSA, an order form or a data processing addendum and get issues, risky clauses and missing terms back with page cites in under a minute. There is no seat minimum, and monthly plans cancel any time. It is not a CLM: no repository, no approval workflow, no SOC 2 report and no SAML SSO yet, so a team that needs those should keep the CLM vendors on the list. After review, you still have to remember what each contract obliges you to do, and software built for tracking obligations and compliance deadlines covers that part for far less than a CLM suite. See all three plans on the LegalSoul pricing page.
Comparing legal AI vendors? Read the Harvey AI alternative for small and midsize law firms, compare CoCounsel pricing Spellbook pricing Lexis AI pricing and Legora pricing, check the LegalSoul pricing tiers, or see what the review engine checks.